Monday, July 23, 2012

COULD SAMSUNG's KISS WITH APPLE BE A WEDDING IN HEAVEN?: IF YES BLESS MY TRAIN


  Apple Inc, through a court jurisdiction have lost the battle with it's best & top-most selling predecessor Samsung. Judge Colin Birss made the final but "Good" kind of judgement towards Apple. Is judge colin having characters? Is he insinuating on something here? Well that's a puzzle game involving a 6-sided cubical dice with no snake-ladder to climb on. Am very much opportunistic that judge colin wasn't considering his job a life-time priority rather a game that will only make him stink rich forever. Considering the 1st judgement, he gave out an appeal stating Samsung's defeat only to change the statement during the 2nd attempt stating that apple's case with Samsung claiming to have copied their design of iPad wasn't a case to be checked upon. I think judge Colin is trying much harder to play his cards closer to his chest but as a matter of fact he's holding them the other way round for his opponent to peep on. Up-to-date Samsung hasn't responded to Apple's mode of letter revealed last week during a press release. Because every game considered a sport event has to bear it's winners & losers at the same time, Apple did the loser part as Judge colin cleanly declared their case childish & empty claims with no reasonable doubts as he made Apple apologize to Samsung through an Ad saying "Samsung didn't copy the iPad.  Indeed it's a battle with no referee to pause,Advice or even initialize & as well declare the game off. Was Apple happy about it? was it worthy to have the ad entail the apology be considered a menace to Samsung? well let's go through the letter & see what apologies that were to be absorbed by Samsung later, in the course of the week. Myself i don't think if those "Apologies" made Samsung portray a coy smile by any means, rather, distort it's meaning & figure towards the smart-phone industry.

Headline no.1 Samsung didn't copy the iPad because they are just NOT cool enough.


Apple Inc :- We've come to realize that Samsung didn't copy the iPad not because they wised their taste but they aren't smart enough to have slimming design ever come to pop-up from their own made thoughts. In the business industry, the CEOs will always mentor, supervise & give way-throughs to their own employees & so do we. Samsung have nothing but to monitor each & every step we make. Why don't you employ your own taste ? or is it the double pickling ideas you guys want from us?



Headline no.2 We are proud to announce that the iPhone 5 is coming soon & Samsung wouldn't copy ANY BETTER as they did to the iPad.


Apple Inc :- If we can't be proud of ourselves who will? 
                   We are also making the good re-launch of the iPhone 5 as rumors persist. Checking on our design, we've come to realize that you (Samsung) haven't got any idea how the RETINA display works all-along with our devices & we thought that's the reason you go round employing lousy bloggers for information about the coming iPhone 5 device. We're not done with you yet, during the launch of the fast & reliable device you name, Samsung galaxy SII nothing came out original after consumers whiled back & told of the default's copy of the iPhone 4S. Samsung why can't you style-up for sure?


  As i told at first, the message portrayed by Apple Inc wasn't going to make Samsung happier in any way. It's the first version of the chapter to see  Apple going nerd & NUDE as for that matter. Ever since, Apple, during the sensor of initial years, hasn't behaved this Gaulish & bullish to it's predecessor. Normally they say whenever a spider re-makes it's web for the second time then predict for more prays landing on the same area. Samsung has got a blow for that reason & Apple has won the battle & the RETINA display they say, its's the core-Active cornerstone holding their units of sales but does Apple really consider Samsung has opened it's wide net ready for the big fish catch? & has it realized Samsung has made close-sales of about 10 MILLION units?. If Apple really had this in mind, they couldn't have replied to Samsung with such violent & insinuating wordings as portrayed on their letter. Apple should live to remember that in any prevailing industry there has to come a competition & so is Samsung embarking on it's journey.





5 comments:

  1. However much Apple had been wronged, I don't much like the way they responded and that's a thumbs-down to them.
    All the same, if it's true that Samsung indeed stole Apple's technology (not the design...), then that's a big infringement by Samsung and they (Samsung) got a long way to clear their name in this.
    All-in-all, let's hope they reach a conclusive agreement between them as soon as possible...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Myself i didn't like the response. What i can say about Apple is, let them try to realize that technology isn't made for them alone & competition will be a mind-maze to both industries. Shame-on you Apple Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Apple should learn to share the tech to the East, not all of us can afford commodities from the West! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. apple should be redy for a serious competition and y'all have spoken we need people who become creative with the available technology and make it their own...thumbs up samsung!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sospeter i get your voice. You & i have one thing in common ( Creativity) is the only reality check here. Thank-you.

    ReplyDelete