I don't understand why Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer is rather jocular than being composed when giving proper fore-steps as CEO. Checking the past, MS-Cop (Microsoft Cop) has given elegant directives & measures when combating issues with security threats. Mcafee has hold the strong roots tangled & technically integrated with it's line of OS starting with WinXP all the way to it's latest OS, windows 8. Every year principals regarding security has given +ve graphs to ensure malware & other computer infections are taken care of. What does it tell when best performing students give head-shaking grades come end of term? does this concerns minimal exhaustions of brain cells as far as scanning therapy is concerned? why should it be a company like Microsoft that reigned before Apple Inc obtaining the last pie of graph survey every time principals in security organization come to table?
Poor levity construction within the OS architecture
Last week a group of security on look-out made it's 5th base analysis on best ground breaking antiviruses' performance. This time OS architecture was line of topic with loops & code-bond being inclusive. Mac as a subsidiary OS as many view it, made the best, portraying core architecture with balanced line of code ( How execution of code is performed behind a system). Most malware inhibit the weakest point on loops most likely boot-sectors & kernel alliteration. Microsoft windows with 2 points on check made a down fall - tailing the performance chat with (-4.5) from (+6.2) of still a deduction of last years' performance of which (+8.5) was it's jaw dropping & most likely Excellent performance ever made in the index history in it's previous years.
On-going laxity on IS executive
For decades, company like Apple has reached on threshold & I don't think it's by treasure which uplifts the core excellence in making such a complex & magnified OS which is today known as the Mac OS X . Mac, from the common word Macintosh has (IS) executive that form green flags when security issues is on the rise. Encapsulating it's line of security for the good of end-users. What of Microsoft? No one knows what Steve Ballmer (Microsoft CEO) has been planning for Microsoft. Of-course Microsoft has given green light to it's surface tablet & i can't deny about it but with windows defender i can't say it's serving me purpose. Last week we had a case of zero day malware executing arbitrary code without the users knowledge, here, we had individuals running windows tolling the infection table with a total of 64% while the remaining pie under neutrality with slight infections of about 20 > 35%.
- So far Microsoft's windows defender was trailing from behind as Bit-defender, Panda, avast, security essentials & Kaspersky made the top as leading & global, p security softwares with 4>5 star rating. Am currently switched to Mac OS X Snow White v10.6.5 taking over my system as i await Microsoft's finale change on it's windows defender. Still on doubt as to why such results have made Microsoft a nagging OS? point me your thoughts inside the comments' box.
I have never trusted the windows 8 that much but of course with your technical help I have managed to embrace mac OS X which is good at delivery.
ReplyDeleteThat's good twii. you can imagine having a soldier who is of no help. I think it's time Microsoft to lay back & see reasons as to why security, be it locally or remotely is important especially as we're migrating to cloud computing. Thank-you!
Delete